Fini sull'infamia racial laws: here, here and here. Why did he do? Why not be limited to one ( duty) orders? It 'hard to its electorate welcome this statement. It 'hard to hear such things from a right, or center or center-left, for that matter. In Italy it is rather a whole wanting to curry favor with the Vatican, even by people who apply little Catholic principles.
But most of all: you sure that Fini is wrong? That " not know a page of national history ? There was a conviction very clear and insistent, by the Church, the racial laws? Not only was conducted instead a while laudable secret battle for the salvation of the Jews, often entrusted to individual heroic? And if it is true that the Church's action has never been a stark contrast against the fascist racial laws in general and in particular, is considered a valid position for a religious body? Would not it be more desirable attitude of condemnation clear, clear and insistent? It is this attitude of complicity, at least apparently, in contrast with the work of a spiritual guide not only generic, but typical of Christ himself, who in his time, with uncompromising courage, against all odds, says inaffermabile , the inconceivable, namely the universal brotherhood?
And I wonder still, facing the obvious, blatant racism by members of the vaunted League, it is conceivable that here and now, the Church does not express a firm, clear and irrefutable objection against them? Why for homosexuals or embryos or feel Eluana thunderous words, while Bossi, Borghezio & co. there is no similar violence?
