
Playlove is a story of betrayed love that has nothing really strange or sick, or extreme ( except for the brackets in the room where the two men deepen their knowledge, but there is just some flash ). I will say it is not necessary. It 's true.
The problem then becomes twofold: first Playlove is too simple a story, which tends toward a final twist that's almost impossible not to expect. The same plot twist is too much "snap" with the rest of the story: too many exploits of the characters hitherto described, seems excessively "decided to table".
Second, a story flat, rather than "normal" rather than classic, made with cold and alienating the canons of our designs, produces, at least in me a feeling of detachment. As if they had used the wrong tools or materials to build it. Last
( and maybe least), I was annoyed at the "where the streets have no name": the citation of U2 thrown in, out, that whale as background music in two scenes, for no reason (to unless, of course, that I have not missed something ). I will say, because there must be a reason? Well, just because it is there, stands on the cover . If all other bricks of the story are strictly functional to the narrative, as (it must be said ) is a little habit of Martin, it seems strange that the same logic is not kept for one thing conventionally ( often more of the same title) as the subtitle. For a review
( and an opinion opposite to my ): here.